Mutton Curry Calories: Leg and Shoulder Worked Out

By NYUS Inc. · Published 29 October 2026

"Mutton curry calories", with "per 100g", "per 200g", "and protein" and "per serving", is searched in India, and the answers online differ. In India mutton usually means goat meat, and IFCT 2017 names its rows goat. No primary table has a mutton curry record: IFCT 2017, the Indian Food Composition Tables from ICMR-NIN, prints almost entirely raw foods (its few cooked rows are boiled and omelette eggs and roasted vermicelli) and no mutton curry, gravy or other mixed dish, and no cooking oil row, and USDA FoodData Central SR Legacy has no mutton curry record. So this page does not quote a number. It works one portion out line by line: the meat, onion, tomato, ginger and garlic from named IFCT 2017 rows and the oil from a USDA record, with weights that are our assumptions and the oil shown apart so you can see what it adds, for a leg curry and a shoulder curry. They are estimates, shown so you can change the weights to match your pot. For the raw cuts see our mutton protein guide, for cooked goat meat per 100 g from USDA our cooked mutton guide, and for the teaspoon values our ghee, oil and sugar guide.

The short answer

By our working, one portion of leg curry (150 g raw goat leg meat, onion 100 g, tomato 100 g, ginger 5 g, garlic 5 g and 2 teaspoons of oil) is about 395.2 kcal and 35.8 g protein, and the same with shoulder meat is about 437.5 kcal and 33.2 g protein. Across 100 to 200 g of raw meat, both cuts and 1 to 3 teaspoons of oil the range is 275.5 to 571.3 kcal, every cell cooked with oil. These are estimates from the weights below, not measured values and not from a curry record. Our reading: in each main case the meat is the largest line (239.8 kcal for leg, 282.1 kcal for shoulder, against 75.8 kcal for the onion, tomato, ginger and garlic and 79.6 kcal for the oil), and the shoulder curry is 42.3 kcal above the leg curry at equal weights.

IFCT 2017 rows used, per 100 g

IFCT 2017 Table 1 prints, per 100 g edible portion, water, protein, ash, total fat and energy in kJ for each food, with carbohydrate and fibre columns for plant foods (the meat rows print neither). We read these 6 rows from the PDF text on 29 October 2026, as the mean of the regions shown; the kcal is ours (kJ divided by 4.184, to 0.1). IFCT prints no portion weights and these rows are raw foods, so we count raw weights; the meat rows are the raw edible portion, without bone.

The oil: USDA SR Legacy, per 100 g

IFCT 2017 has no cooking oil row, so the oil comes from USDA FoodData Central SR Legacy; it is a US record. Energy is USDA's kcal with the kJ beside it; water, protein, total fat and carbohydrate (by difference) are in g, then fibre (g), total sugars (g) and sodium (mg), all per 100 g.

The data-type label on each USDA field, as the record shows it

USDA's record page shows a data-type label beside some fields and none beside others. This table copies what the record shows, read field by field from the nutrient table of the record page; "no label shown" means the record prints no label there, and "not printed" means the record has no row for that field. We do not interpret the labels beyond printing them. IFCT 2017 prints no such labels.

The household portions USDA prints for the oil

These are the entries in the record's Measures list, as printed; the other entry is 100 g. The kcal in the last column is ours: the printed kcal per 100 g times the grams, divided by 100, shown to 0.1.

The portion sums: 171410 1 tsp (4.5 g): 884 × 4.5 / 100 = 39.78, so 39.8 kcal; 171410 1 cup (216 g): 884 × 216 / 100 = 1909.44, so 1909.4 kcal; 171410 1 tbsp (13.5 g): 884 × 13.5 / 100 = 119.34, so 119.3 kcal. By the same arithmetic 1 teaspoon (4.5 g) is 39.8 kcal, 2 teaspoons 79.6 kcal and 3 teaspoons 119.3 kcal.

Worked example 1: leg curry

Every weight here is our assumption for one portion, counted raw: 150 g of raw goat meat (the way IFCT's rows are given: edible portion, no bone), onion, tomato, ginger and garlic, cooked in peanut oil. Each IFCT line is the kJ divided by 4.184, times the grams, divided by 100, to 0.1 kcal; the oil line is USDA's printed kcal per 100 g times the grams, divided by 100; protein is the table's protein per 100 g times the grams, divided by 100. Spice powders, salt, coconut, cream and curd are not counted, and the weight of the cooked curry is not printed in any table.

The grid varies the weight of raw meat (100, 150 or 200 g) and the oil (1, 2 or 3 teaspoons); the onion, tomato, ginger and garlic stay as above.

Worked example 2: shoulder curry

Same method and the same onion, tomato, ginger, garlic and oil; only the meat row changes, to IFCT O001 (shoulder), which prints more fat than the leg.

The grid varies the weight of raw meat (100, 150 or 200 g) and the oil (1, 2 or 3 teaspoons); the onion, tomato, ginger and garlic stay as above.

The two main cases side by side

These are the single examples used in the short answer; each follows from the tables above and from the weights in the cell.

What stands out in the numbers

• The meat is the largest line: 150 g of raw meat is 239.8 kcal for leg (IFCT O003) and 282.1 kcal for shoulder (O001), against 75.8 kcal for 100 g of onion, 100 g of tomato, ginger and garlic together.
• Leg against shoulder: at 150 g and 2 teaspoons of oil the shoulder curry is 42.3 kcal higher, which follows from the rows' energy (787 kJ per 100 g for shoulder against 669 kJ for leg, with 11.94 g of fat against 7.94 g); the leg row has more protein (22.07 g against 20.33 g per 100 g).
• Oil against meat weight: in this working the meat weight (100 to 200 g) moves the leg curry more than the oil: 159.9 kcal against 79.5 kcal. Each teaspoon is 39.8 kcal.
• Protein: about 35.8 g in the main-case leg curry and 33.2 g in the shoulder curry.
• These are estimates: no curry record exists, the weights are ours, and coconut, cream, curd, potato or more oil will be higher.

Why these are estimates, not your curry

• No record exists for the dish. IFCT 2017 prints almost entirely raw foods and no mixed dish, and USDA SR Legacy has no mutton curry record.
• The weights are assumptions. No table prints how much meat, gravy base or oil one portion takes; ours are stated so you can replace them.
• Meat weight is raw and boneless. A portion served on the bone is not what these rows describe, and bones add to the weight of a plate without adding to the meat.
• No per 100 g figure. No table prints a cooked curry weight, so a calories-per-100-g number cannot be derived from these rows.
• US oil data. The oil row is a US record; IFCT has none.
• Labels are printed, not judged. Calculated and the other labels are USDA's words on the record; we print them and draw no conclusion from them.

How to log it so the numbers hold

• Log it by parts. Weigh the meat raw and boneless, estimate the onion and tomato, and log the oil by its own weight (weight × figure ÷ 100); our ghee, oil and sugar guide has the teaspoon values.
• Say which cut. Leg and shoulder differ by 42.3 kcal at the same weight and oil.
• Say how much oil. It is an input this page cannot know; a teaspoon is 39.8 kcal.
• Log the rice or roti separately. They are not in these figures.

Where NYUS fits (our app)

We make NYUS, so read this as ours. NYUS is an AI fitness and nutrition coach in early access on Android, with no ads and no data selling. You log foods yourself by searching 8,900+ Indian and global foods or by barcode, and a weekly check-in adjusts your calories, macros and step goal once enough is logged. Barcode coverage of Indian packaged foods is not complete, so search by name when a scan finds nothing.

What this page leaves out

• A measured calorie figure for mutton curry as a dish: no primary record prints one, so every figure here is an estimate from stated weights.
• A calorie target, and any claim about what mutton or this curry does to your body: we have not looked up any for any person, so we give none. If you have a medical condition or are pregnant, ask your doctor or dietitian.
• Spice powders, salt, coconut, cream, curd, potato, cashew paste, and other versions such as keema, korma, rogan josh or curry cooked with bone: not covered; log them from their own rows.
• Restaurant, dhaba and packaged mutton curries: no table prints a restaurant weight or oil use, so we give no such figure; read the pack for packaged ones.
• Other goat and sheep rows (chops, liver and the rest) and other IFCT rows for the same vegetables: they exist and are not used here.
• Nutrients beyond energy, water, protein, fat, carbohydrate, fibre, total sugars and sodium: not covered here.

Sources

• ICMR-NIN, Indian Food Composition Tables 2017 (IFCT 2017), Table 1, per 100 g edible portion, mean of the regions shown (read from the PDF text 29 October 2026): O003 Goat, legs (6 regions, 669 kJ, PDF p. 59); O001 Goat, shoulder (6 regions, 787 kJ, PDF p. 59); G017 Onion, big (6 regions, 201 kJ, PDF p. 54); D075 Tomato, ripe, hybrid (6 regions, 79 kJ, PDF p. 48); G014 Ginger, fresh (6 regions, 230 kJ, PDF p. 54); G011 Garlic, big clove (6 regions, 518 kJ, PDF p. 54). IFCT 2017 prints almost entirely raw foods (its few cooked rows are boiled and omelette eggs and roasted vermicelli) and no mutton curry, gravy or other mixed dish, and no cooking oil row (PDF text searched for curry, gravy, masala and oil; the goat rows are O001 to O013, and we use O001 (shoulder) and O003 (legs), PDF p. 59).
• USDA FoodData Central, SR Legacy 171410 (Oil, peanut, salad or cooking): Energy 884 kcal (3700 kJ), protein 0 g, total fat 100 g, carbohydrate by difference 0 g, fibre 0 g, total sugars 0 g, sodium 0 mg per 100 g; labels as printed: kcal Calculated, carbohydrate by difference no label shown, total sugars Assumed zero (Insignificant amount or not naturally occurring in a food, such as fiber in meat); portions used: 1 tsp (4.5 g); 1 cup (216 g); 1 tbsp (13.5 g) (read 29 October 2026).
• nyus.in, the NYUS landing page, read on 29 October 2026 for the app statements in the NYUS section and the CTA.

The ingredient weights, the kJ to kcal conversions, the line values, the sums, the grids, the portion kcal, the rounding, the comparisons and every sentence starting "Our reading" are NYUS's own assumptions, arithmetic or opinion, not from USDA or IFCT. The IFCT values are the means printed in IFCT 2017 Table 1; the USDA values, data-type labels and Measures-list portions are exactly as shown on the USDA record page. The names in the first column are the tables' own names.

Frequently asked questions